NANO HUB is the exchange that carries transactions between healthcare providers and payers — eligibility, e-prescription verification, pre-authorisation and claim submission — securely, and in a standard form both sides already understand. The portal is built around the workflows that actually connect the two, using international coding standards rather than each party's own format.
That plumbing is what value-based payment depends on. A payer cannot reward outcomes it cannot see, and a provider cannot be measured on quality if eligibility and authorisation decisions arrive by phone. The sections below set out what value-based care asks for; the HUB is how the transactions behind it move.
Value-based payment is the arrangement in which healthcare regulators (government, employers and consumers) and payers, public and private, hold providers — physicians, other clinicians and hospitals — accountable for both the quality and the cost of care delivered at national scale.
Value here means paying for high-quality service at a reasonable cost, rather than paying for the number of things done.
Pay for performance : drives outcomes, spreads best practice and improves patient satisfaction through timely intervention. Of the models here, this is the one that most favours providers.
Bundled payments : one comprehensive payment covers an entire episode of care, which forces care integration and tends to reduce total cost.
Shared savings : providers are rewarded against the quality and experience of the care given, so improvement in the care is what produces the saving.
Shared risk : payer and provider both carry risk, which raises the attention paid to quality and cost on both sides.
Capitation : billing follows the quality of service rather than its quantity, which changes what the whole system optimises for.
Value based healthcare is a reimbursement program that benefits healthcare providers with incentives based on the quality of care they provide to the patients.
Essentially, value based healthcare models always revolve around the patient’s treatment and how well the care team can improve patient outcomes based on certain metrics, such as reducing hospital readmissions, improving preventative care, providing quality care, and using particular kinds of certified health technology.
Fee-for-service is the more traditional & also a good program for healthcare reimbursement model, based on the kind of services a healthcare provider performed. This system incentivizes providers to order more laboratory tests and procedures thereby increasing the cost and total number of patients in order to bring in more money.
This is the key difference with value based care vs. fee-for-service care. The former provides incentives and feel proud of their approach for quality, while the latter stresses more on quantity.
Products in the suite that work alongside this one.